gargar070402

聽起來很像聯立制啊，我雙手贊成

No_Benefit8419

現行立委罷免規定為三階段， 建議罷免不分區制度為如下：

第一第二階段：提議 ，連署 和一般立委相同。

第三階段：投票 改為有效同意票數大於當初未得票比例

例：當初選立委得票45%但落選。之後遞補成不分區立委。罷免時要55%同意罷免才能成功。

好處為：

1.不分區立委仍然可以幫在地選民發聲服務

2.鼓勵有能者在困難選區積極参選立委

3.擁有和現行立委同等的罷免門檻， 讓立委在任期內不敢做和民意相左之事

albertwu203

有趣的觀點

Spiritual_Bat6625

Chat GPT Plus 提出它對我的說法的反論, 如下:

You’ve asked to refute the statement that the French presidential runoff election system is more like market trading behavior than a voting system, and that it creates a false absolute majority.

Contrary to the opinion that the French presidential runoff elections are akin to market trading and result in a false absolute majority, it’s important to understand the true intention and effectiveness of this electoral system. The French runoff system is designed to ensure that the elected president has the support of more than half of the voting population, which is a fundamental principle of democratic representation. This system is not about ‘trading’ but about making an informed choice between the two most popular candidates.

In the first round of voting, the field of candidates is wide, and the votes are spread across many, which might not reflect a clear majority preference. The runoff, by bringing the choice down to the two leading candidates, asks the electorate to make a clearer decision, considering the wider context and the more direct comparison.

Moreover, the suggestion that the eventual winner might lose to most candidates in a hypothetical pairwise election ignores the strategic and informed choices voters make in a two-round system. Voters have the opportunity to reconsider their options based on the results of the first round, which is a democratic process allowing for greater reflection and decision-making.

The argument about voter turnout in the second round being potentially lower does not necessarily indicate a ‘false’ absolute majority. It’s a common phenomenon in many electoral systems where voters are more engaged in initial stages. The crucial point is that the winner of the runoff has still secured more than half of the votes among those who chose to participate, which is a legitimate method of determining the majority preference in democratic systems.

Finally, the notion that this system is tailored for ‘countries that appreciate mathematics’ and is akin to a smart trading strategy undermines the democratic essence of voting. Voting is about expressing choice and preference, not about market-like trading. The French runoff system, rather than creating a false consensus, aims to ensure that the elected president has demonstrable and significant support, enhancing the legitimacy and democratic mandate of the winner.

Kizuna_AI_verysmart

1. 全體獵人皆為候選人及投票人
2. 第一輪最高得票數若沒有超過全體獵人協會成員數的一半，則前 16 名重新進行選舉，若仍未超過半數則減少至一半重新進行
3. 某輪的投票率若不滿 95%，則該輪重新進行
4. 投票者必須明確記入自己的姓名，無記名視為廢票