uniyk at 2024-05-25 09:16:04+00:00 ID: l5laedn

反美反西方反自由民主、极端国家主义

这是靠网信办删帖封号抓人、网评员和天真的在校学生占领网络发声位置来支撑的。

没有中宣部的经费，舆论局势天翻地覆只需要几天，比如白纸运动、比如年初的股市崩溃。

Physalis_F at 2024-06-09 01:23:29+00:00 ID: l7r70r8

永乐大典，又乐又典（

Puzzleheaded_Camp903 at 2024-05-24 05:17:44+00:00 ID: l5fj9j5

搞汉皇更没合法性了，到时候姓姬的姓嬴的跳出来说天皇万世一系赶紧尊皇讨奸、赶紧倒幕

Liliyuanshangcao (OP) at 2024-05-26 06:40:15+00:00 ID: l5ppfr1

当年政改要求两院制，要求人大作为下院，政协作为上院，而小平同志认为，还是不要搞两院制，搞一院制，就是人民代表大会一院制，全国人大是最高国家权力机关。

Liliyuanshangcao (OP) at 2024-05-25 10:26:38+00:00 ID: l5lftrx

那是自然。毛成功的把知识分子党洗成一个泥腿子农民党，自然而然是完成了一次自上而下的意识形态蜕变的。

顺便一提，毛对马克思的著作可以说是一知半解，目前我没有看到任何证据说毛系统性的读过马克思的著作。准确的说，我没有看到任何证据说毛泽东哪怕读完过资本论。

反倒是另一个人在青年时期在日记里面整天写自己爱读马克思和新青年、你猜他是谁？

对的，蒋介石。

Real_Mushroom_8964 at 2024-05-24 06:49:38+00:00 ID: l5frp2u

哈哈很有可能

bzlzbzlz at 2024-05-24 14:38:17+00:00 ID: l5h6heo

而且外部威胁和内部威胁一样大。老钟历史上其实从来没做到过今天这么大，现在全世界都知道老钟是什么货色了，必须一拍到底。

Liliyuanshangcao (OP) at 2024-05-23 11:36:42+00:00 ID: l5b4dt6

码一半儿手机没电了

paiotu at 2024-05-23 22:35:54+00:00 ID: l5e3aob

看起来到了而且快结束了

Average_Suouian at 2024-05-29 06:37:19+00:00 ID: l652epg

Mao innovatively destroyed the revolutionary leftist theories of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Stalin. Based on his adeptness with Chinese Confucian classics and historical records, Mao, who knew nothing about Marxism but was proficient in Chinese classics and historical records, eliminated the rigid and essentially leftist liberalism of the noble intellectuals from the revolutionary ranks and ideological field. He created a “pseudo-red, true totalitarian” ideological system that adapted internally to the Qin dynasty (Mao personally rehabilitated Qin Shihuang) and transcended national boundaries and classes externally. Its ideological highlights include but are not limited to: (1) Assimilating Japanese Kwantung Army, Korean liberation soldiers, East Turkestan elements, etc., into the revolutionary ranks to deal with the legitimate government at the time; (2) Becoming the true red sun in the eyes of Western leftists during the wave of socialism in France and Latin America; (3) After the failure of the Great Leap Forward, swiftly launching political movements to thoroughly and vigorously strike against the rapidly bureaucratized administrative and governmental officials, which had a far smaller impact, death toll, and cruelty compared to the “Great Famine” movement, becoming a personal pain for numerous CCP officials who were rehabilitated and surrendered at least twice and luckily survived into the 1980s, to the extent that it created a new literary genre— “scar literature”—influencing the creation process of “The Three-Body Problem,” a “masterpiece” by the literary giant Liu Cixin (The Cultural Revolution had countless negatives, but it fostered Liu Cixin, which I think was worth it (dog head preserved)).

Major setbacks: The escape of Lin Biao, the Tiananmen Square Incident of April 4th-5th.

Average_Suouian at 2024-05-29 06:38:21+00:00 ID: l652hyl

The fourth instance of ideological bankruptcy is the failure of Xi’s omnipotent emperor model. Its bankruptcy is represented by the comprehensive failure of epidemic prevention and control, under the premise of a series of planned institutional returns. If the ideological framework of the Jiang-Hu era—such as the elitism reflected in the “Three Represents” and the “scientism” reflected in the “Scientific Outlook on Development” —was the “science” and “reason” advocated by Europeans in the 19th and 18th centuries, then the ideological framework applied by Xi after his coronation regresses to a “simple” understanding of the world on the eve of the European Renaissance. There are two characteristics of Xi’s ideology: conservatism and anti-Americanism and anti-modernism. These two complement each other and are mutually causal. This kind of regression by several hundred years in a society like 21st-century China, which is already halfway into modern globalized economy, has led to severe dissonance. And this dissonance has exacerbated the bankruptcy of “capitalists,” who had no foundation to begin with, surrendering their assets to save themselves, accelerating the process of “state advancement and people’s retreat,” thus further accelerating this vicious cycle.

What’s even more deadly is that Emperor Xi attempts to gain legitimacy through this set of ancient values and views of the world that are incompatible with modern society, and also tries to elevate this set of backward thinking hundreds of years above the modern world to construct the “Four Confidences” and “view the world on an equal footing”—the former advocates the “understanding of the world” handed down from “sage kings” and the version of “world view” inherited from Hong Xiuquan, and the latter compromises Wang Huning, who, at the end of his “academic career,” still has to package this pile of “Xi Thought” like a piece of shit into “philosopher politics” described by ancient Greek sages, trying to persuade the world that “the scenery here is unique.” After failing to persuade left, center, and right varieties of “Westerners,” Emperor Xi urgently needs a thorough victory to dispel the clouds. At this time, the COVID-19 epidemic seemed to arrive like a brave knight riding a rainbow cloud. For a while, our wise emperor seemed to shine brightly throughout the universe.

Although this kind of ideological victory based on “epidemic prevention” is a top-down nationwide fantasy from Xi Jinping to little pink worms in the echo chamber, it is simply unable to withstand the test of natural laws. After Xi’s epidemic prevention and control paralyzed Chinese society and livelihoods, fearing that a few students holding a few pieces of blank paper would change the course of the country, the once “nationwide prevention and control” turned into “nationwide infection” in a moment, its absurdity can only be described as magical realism. Under a series of ideological blows in 2022-2023, the Xi era’s socialism with Chinese characteristics, which lacked the “wise ruler, virtuous ruler,” retrograde, pseudo-Greek-style refuge, was left with only one pillar: “anti-American,” “anti-Western,” and “anti-modern.” Two pillars (retrogression and anti-Americanism) have collapsed halfway, and the other one may not hold for long.

Average_Suouian at 2024-05-29 06:37:35+00:00 ID: l652fit

The second instance of ideological bankruptcy: the failure of the pragmatic route of Comrade Shopping, marked by the Tiananmen Square Massacre of 1989, ended tragically and shamefully. Since then, there has been no confrontation between reformists and conservatives within the CCP. The possibility of orderly political reform was substantially shattered. Under the guidance of pragmatism and empiricism, prominent constitutional achievements on a national scale (such as minority policies, multi-level elections (opening the door first at the village level), separation of party and government, constitutional supremacy, unicameral system of the People’s Congress, and attempts at multi-party consultative politics) gradually became rigid and were revoked or abandoned during the periods of Jiang, Hu, and Xi.

Pragmatism has a long historical origin, from James, to Dewey, to Hu Shi. Under Deng, it was summarized as the theory of cats. This ideological system indeed worked, but its ideological appeal was nowhere near as strong as Maoist communism. Its high point was probably the nationwide reform and opening up process that exploded after the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee. Because ordinary users insisted that “emphasizing practical experience is the most important, while principles and reasoning are secondary,” it quickly broke away from the fantasy of Maoist communism. However, due to its emphasis on practical interests, realism, and results orientation, it led to embarrassment in every aspect of Chinese politics, economics, culture, management, quality, environment, legal affairs, and philosophy compared to Westerners. According to pragmatism, China should completely abandon everything cherished by the conservative faction of the CCP (in a nutshell, peasants) and fully embrace the “blue civilization.” Ultimately, the peaceful demonstrations and protests brought about by “blue civilization” and “marine civilization” were easily thwarted by the peasant’s mud guns, mud cannons, and mud tanks. The Romanians further west, however, gave a good lesson to uninformed students and citizens two years later.

Major setback: The 1987 Student Movement.

Average_Suouian at 2024-05-29 06:38:32+00:00 ID: l652ikm

Nuanced Expressions for Foreigners:

1. “Pink worms” - This term is a derogatory reference to ardent supporters of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), often found on social media platforms defending CCP policies and actions fervently.
2. “Swampy people” - This expression implies individuals who have followed the CCP blindly, even as it descends into moral or ideological bankruptcy.
3. “Comrade Shopping” - This term sarcastically refers to Deng Xiaoping, who famously said, “To be rich is glorious,” indicating his embrace of capitalist economic policies.
4. “Three Represents” and “Scientific Outlook on Development” - These are ideological concepts promoted by the CCP during the Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao eras, respectively, which aimed to adapt Marxist theory to contemporary Chinese realities.
5. “Blue civilization” - This refers to a hypothetical modernization pathway advocated by some Chinese intellectuals, emphasizing the adoption of Western democratic values and institutions.
6. “New Money” - This term refers to individuals who have acquired wealth through China’s economic reforms, often contrasted with the traditional elite.
7. “Emperor Xi” - This phrase sarcastically portrays Xi Jinping’s increasingly authoritarian rule, likening him to an emperor with unchecked power.
8. “Little pink worms” - This term, similar to “pink worms,” refers to young, often nationalistic Chinese internet users who fervently support the CCP.
9. “Nationwide fantasy” - This phrase denotes propaganda or narratives promoted by the CCP to maintain control or support for its policies, often regardless of their basis in reality.
10. “Magical realism” - This literary term is used metaphorically to describe situations or events that are surreal or fantastical but accepted as part of everyday reality.
11. “Socialism with Chinese characteristics” - This phrase encapsulates the CCP’s adaptation of socialist principles to fit China’s specific historical and cultural context, often associated with market-oriented reforms.

Average_Suouian at 2024-05-29 06:37:56+00:00 ID: l652gma

The third instance of ideological bankruptcy was the failure of the architecture of a people’s party and an elite party centered on the Jiang-Hu axis. The ideological framework of a people’s big-tent party built on the Three Represents and the Scientific Outlook on Development by the Jiang-Hu axis was not a theoretical innovation but a response to the dilemma of how to absorb private property rights and the widespread presence of “wild capitalists” after the political reform road was blocked. It is well known that the tragedy of the Qing dynasty’s autocracy, which stopped the imperial examination system at the end of the Qing dynasty, demonstrated how uncomfortable these people would be if they were not provided with upward channels within the system, and in just a few decades, the old Chinese intellectuals and New Money who had been interrupted four or five times in their spine-seeking journey, had how lonely they would be. However, whether it was the Spanish inspection team, the Singapore inspection team, or the extremely discordant Nordic inspection team, they could not provide any form of reference for the Jiang-Hu core team. The authoritarianism’s complete disintegration was not only reflected in the malignant and openly displayed political struggles at the end of Hu-Wen’s period but also in the embarrassment of the traditional Confucian disrespect for “political decrees not coming from the Central Plains.” Because from beginning to end, the core of the Jiang-Hu axis was unable to institutionalize anti-corruption in the stagnant political arena and lacked the ability to break away from the path dependency based on foreign trade in the economy. However, ironically, perhaps because of the widespread arrogance and unconscious disdain of Westerners towards the Far East, the deteriorating narrative of the CCP at this time was not captured by the West, but rather witnessed a period of absurdity where Western leftists praised Chinese socialism while Western rightists praised China’s sweatshops. This arrogance towards the Far East actually allowed China to tell a fairy tale of “peaceful rise” quite comfortably.

Key blow: Corruption out of control during the Hu-Wen era, the Zhou Yongkang Central Committee political upheaval.

Heavy-Perspective123 at 2024-05-28 15:01:39+00:00 ID: l61701s

你以为他真的有啥见解嘛，大多只是道听途说罢了。天天搞洼地论有啥作用？讨厌毛邓江胡习没问题，可是老百姓就是吃他那一套，反倒是op扯怎么多，墙民会听嘛？墙民不就有肉吃就行吗，关你屁事。

找他说的那一套我也可以写个美国ysxt破产论，第一次是大陆制宪会议，违背了十三州独立精神，埋下了联邦与州的对立。

第二次是汉密尔顿崛起，彻底把人民变成了联邦的奴隶。

第三次是南北战争，放弃了传统新教精神，彻底变成工业吸血鬼资本家，全程没人关心黑奴。

第四次是一战二战，开始用国内的财富到国外沾花惹草，违背了孤立主义。

第五次是民权运动。第六次是朝战越战。第七次是中东支持独裁伊斯兰国家。第八次是冲击白宫。。。太多了，反钟能不能整点好活。。。这种观点根本没啥用处。

民族主义本来就是现代国家的基石，从来没有那么容易倒。

Liliyuanshangcao (OP) at 2024-05-29 07:00:07+00:00 ID: l654dne

汪洋那一套还有点可说的，习、薄的模式没什么意思。